I Am NineOneFour

liberalpropagandagroup:

yoenisthemenace:

He was almost President.

More proof that it doesn’t take anything but a large inheritance to make it in venture capitalism.

(Incidentally, this dipshit is perhaps the least stupid person in the GOP. Conservatives should feel deep, deep shame in that.)

Wow

literarysins:

In light of the 50 Shades of Grey trailer coming out today, quick reminder that that book is about an abusive and controlling relationship, not BDSM.

Fanfiction (published or not) is important for women of all ages to explore gender roles and sexuality in a way that is less stigmatized and more accessible. 

But do not do the BDSM community a disservice by calling the relationship described in the book a standard BDSM experience. 

anticapitalist:

afghangry:

anticapitalist replied to your post: if you only ever followed me for fando…

People still follow me from when I was in my new atheist phase >.<

omg same

My url used to be “godisnotreal”.
At least like 50 people still follow me from back then (woah that was like 4-5 years ago). It’s crazy.

Yo

ilyagerner:

"If you regulate guns, what about [some useful but dangerous thing that’s heavily regulated but no one wants to ban]," is the #1 dumbest argument against gun control.
#2? “Criminals don’t care about gun laws,” a formulation that produces 31,700,000 hits on Google.
This is not how gun laws work.
If someone with a criminal record goes to a federally licensed gun dealer, it doesn’t matter whether he wants to follow the law or not. The dealer, who has a strong interest in following the law because his license to operate openly depends on compliance with regulations, will run the potential purchaser through NICS. Where he’ll get denied. As has happened 700,000 times. So he doesn’t get the gun even if he wants to do this bad thing.
But if someone with a criminal record chooses to buy a gun at a show or via a private seller, they can do so because there’s no requirement for the law-abiding citizen to run the buyer through NICS. That’s why they call it a loophole. 
If gun control proponents are successful in closing that loophole, people with records will have to steal guns (not that easy) or buy them on the illicit market, where they will be much more expensive because the route of gun manufacturer -&gt; dealer -&gt; “clean” buyer -&gt; criminal will be that much more difficult to traverse. Making criminals pay more for weapons is good.

ilyagerner:

"If you regulate guns, what about [some useful but dangerous thing that’s heavily regulated but no one wants to ban]," is the #1 dumbest argument against gun control.

#2? “Criminals don’t care about gun laws,” a formulation that produces 31,700,000 hits on Google.

This is not how gun laws work.

If someone with a criminal record goes to a federally licensed gun dealer, it doesn’t matter whether he wants to follow the law or not. The dealer, who has a strong interest in following the law because his license to operate openly depends on compliance with regulations, will run the potential purchaser through NICS. Where he’ll get denied. As has happened 700,000 times. So he doesn’t get the gun even if he wants to do this bad thing.

But if someone with a criminal record chooses to buy a gun at a show or via a private seller, they can do so because there’s no requirement for the law-abiding citizen to run the buyer through NICS. That’s why they call it a loophole. 

If gun control proponents are successful in closing that loophole, people with records will have to steal guns (not that easy) or buy them on the illicit market, where they will be much more expensive because the route of gun manufacturer -> dealer -> “clean” buyer -> criminal will be that much more difficult to traverse. Making criminals pay more for weapons is good.

datarep:

The Middle East Friendship Chart
Read More

datarep:

The Middle East Friendship Chart

Read More

buckybarnesing:

you ever see a thing that just makes you cackle? x

buckybarnesing:

you ever see a thing that just makes you cackle? x

savannahblair:

I wish I could find clothes that matched.

savannahblair:

I wish I could find clothes that matched.

misandry-mermaid:

scandalouslyfollowing:

nuric:

cap-out-of-time:

schwoozie:

[x]

ooc: Reblogging because holy shit.

I aspire to be this woman when I’m older. 

YASSSSSSS!

This woman was born before women were legally allowed to vote.

So don’t think for a second that she’s joking when she sees you trying to take that right away, Republicans.

liberalpropagandagroup:

sandandglass:

Jon Stewart tries to get Hillary Clinton to say she’s running for president.

Hillary 2016!